<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using OSSEC for Encrypted Log Transport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/</link>
	<description>Information Security, Privacy and Personal Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Starks</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Starks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Well, if you enable logall, OSSEC will have analyzed all of those and then you could use another program to parse out the ones you are interested in. This is a bit different than the method I describe in the post. but it works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you enable logall, OSSEC will have analyzed all of those and then you could use another program to parse out the ones you are interested in. This is a bit different than the method I describe in the post. but it works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-838</guid>
		<description>What if you have, say 10 logs - 9 of which you want to actually &quot;analyze&quot; and the other one you simply want to send to the server to go stored in the DB for logging, as in syslog. So I still want to keep much of OSSEC doing what it does, and a small portion doing the logfile centralization... 

Suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you have, say 10 logs &#8211; 9 of which you want to actually &#8220;analyze&#8221; and the other one you simply want to send to the server to go stored in the DB for logging, as in syslog. So I still want to keep much of OSSEC doing what it does, and a small portion doing the logfile centralization&#8230; </p>
<p>Suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suraj</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Suraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m trying to set this up as well (while keeping ossec analyzing logs). I&#039;m trying to get the logs seperated by host, but all I get is one file with all logs. The syslog-ng logs seem to be following this format:

Mar 22 11:53:30 ossec-server 1:(remotehost) 1.2.3.4-&gt;/var/log/syslog:Mar 22 11:53:29 remotehost snmpd[1965]: Connection from UDP: [4.5.6.7]:55066

I suspect, the problem is caused by the first part and syslog can&#039;t parse the full logline correctly, but maybe I&#039;m doing something wrong here.

Do you have any clues?

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m trying to set this up as well (while keeping ossec analyzing logs). I&#8217;m trying to get the logs seperated by host, but all I get is one file with all logs. The syslog-ng logs seem to be following this format:</p>
<p>Mar 22 11:53:30 ossec-server 1:(remotehost) 1.2.3.4-&gt;/var/log/syslog:Mar 22 11:53:29 remotehost snmpd[1965]: Connection from UDP: [4.5.6.7]:55066</p>
<p>I suspect, the problem is caused by the first part and syslog can&#8217;t parse the full logline correctly, but maybe I&#8217;m doing something wrong here.</p>
<p>Do you have any clues?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Starks</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Starks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Hello tschack,

I&#039;m glad you found the problem, but I wanted to comment in case anyone else runs into this. This can happen if you don&#039;t edit ossec-control, and OSSEC and syslog-ng are both in contention for the queue. Whichever one is started last will win out.

Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello tschack,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you found the problem, but I wanted to comment in case anyone else runs into this. This can happen if you don&#8217;t edit ossec-control, and OSSEC and syslog-ng are both in contention for the queue. Whichever one is started last will win out.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tschack</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>tschack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Forget my post, I found my answer.  Had a misconfiguration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget my post, I found my answer.  Had a misconfiguration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tschack</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>tschack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-801</guid>
		<description>First, great post!  Second, after I set this up, syslog-ng stopped separating the logs base on the server IP (&quot;/var/log/syslog/servers/$HOST/$YEAR.$MONTH.$DAY.$FACILITY.log&quot;).  Everything is going to one log via OSSEC.  Are you experiencing the same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, great post!  Second, after I set this up, syslog-ng stopped separating the logs base on the server IP (&#8220;/var/log/syslog/servers/$HOST/$YEAR.$MONTH.$DAY.$FACILITY.log&#8221;).  Everything is going to one log via OSSEC.  Are you experiencing the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Starks</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Starks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Hello Frank,

I am not that familiar with rsyslog, but I can&#039;t imagine it wouldn&#039;t be able to. As long as it can read a Unix socket it should be fine.

-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Frank,</p>
<p>I am not that familiar with rsyslog, but I can&#8217;t imagine it wouldn&#8217;t be able to. As long as it can read a Unix socket it should be fine.</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Daley</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Excellent idea!

Can rsyslog be configured to achieve the same result?

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent idea!</p>
<p>Can rsyslog be configured to achieve the same result?</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] Using OSSEC for Encrypted Log Transport Detecting Sensitive Info with OSSEC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using OSSEC for Encrypted Log Transport Detecting Sensitive Info with OSSEC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Information Security Bits for 02/01/2010 &#124; Infosec Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.immutablesecurity.com/index.php/2010/01/29/using-ossec-for-encrypted-log-transport/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Information Security Bits for 02/01/2010 &#124; Infosec Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.immutablesecurity.com/?p=416#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] cool. Encrypt your logs before sending them across the wire. Immutable Security &gt;&gt; Using OSSEC for Encrypted Log Transport Tags: ( logging encryption ossec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cool. Encrypt your logs before sending them across the wire. Immutable Security &gt;&gt; Using OSSEC for Encrypted Log Transport Tags: ( logging encryption ossec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

